Current:Home > MarketsIndia’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status -StockLine
India’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status
View
Date:2025-04-20 07:43:13
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — India’s top court on Monday upheld a 2019 decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to strip disputed Jammu and Kashmir’s special status as a semi-autonomous region with a separate constitution and inherited protections on land and jobs.
The five-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the region’s special status had been a “temporary provision” and that removing it in 2019 was constitutionally valid.
The unprecedented move also divided the region into two federal territories, Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir, both ruled directly by the central government without a legislature of their own. As a result, the Muslim-majority region is now run by unelected government officials and has lost its flag, criminal code and constitution.
But Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud said the government has promised to restore Jammu-Kashmir’s statehood and should do so as soon as possible. Ladakh, however, will remain a federal territory.
He also ordered the country’s election commission to hold local legislative polls in the region by next Sept. 30.
The ruling is expected to boost the electoral prospects of Modi’s governing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in national polls next year. The 2019 move resonated in much of India, where the Modi government was cheered by supporters for fulfilling a long-held Hindu nationalist pledge to scrap the Muslim-majority region’s special status.
But the judgment will disappoint many in Kashmir, including the region’s main pro-India Kashmiri politicians who had petitioned the Supreme Court to reverse the deeply unpopular decision, which was imposed under an unprecedented security and communication clampdown that lasted many months.
The court’s hearings began in August and included extensive arguments and discussions on the move’s constitutional validity.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Myanmar overtakes Afghanistan as the world's biggest opium producer, U.N. says
- When do babies roll over? What parents need to know about this milestone.
- Stranger charged with break-in, murder in slaying of Detroit synagogue leader
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Author Cait Corrain loses book deal after creating fake profiles for bad reviews on Goodreads
- Armenia and Azerbaijan exchange POWs in line with agreement announced last week
- Bodies of 4 people found in burning southeastern Indiana home, police say
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Mysterious shipwreck measuring over 200 feet long found at bottom of Baltic Sea
Ranking
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- The Supreme Court will hear arguments about mifepristone. What is the drug and how does it work?
- NCAA survey of 23,000 student-athletes shows mental health concerns have lessened post-pandemic
- The Fed leaves interest rates unchanged as cooling inflation provides comfort
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- It’s a ‘silly notion’ that Trump’s Georgia case should pause for the election, Willis tells the AP
- Oprah Winfrey Reveals She's Using a Weight-Loss Medication
- Supreme Court to hear dispute over obstruction law used to prosecute Jan. 6 defendants
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Cardinals, Anheuser-Busch agree to marketing extension, including stadium naming rights
Fire at a popular open market in Bangkok spews black smoke visible for miles
House to vote on formalizing Biden impeachment inquiry today
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Far-right Dutch election winner Wilders wants to be prime minister, promises to respect constitution
Will we ever learn who won the $1.76 billion Powerball jackpot in California? Here's what we know
'Monk' returns for one 'Last Case' and it's a heaping serving of TV comfort food